tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2196408733789348967.post2011162446770493704..comments2023-06-21T04:35:40.085-07:00Comments on Random Spiritualities from a Doctor's Chair: Who are You Preaching For?Alex Tanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04003300678212296112noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2196408733789348967.post-44071468404739221582009-11-27T02:34:30.879-08:002009-11-27T02:34:30.879-08:00yes, many preachers make themselves relevant by pr...yes, many preachers make themselves relevant by preaching for the nod.is this not "contextualised preaching", target the needs of the people?<br><br>just wondering...Von Rad 文纳http://www.blogger.com/profile/11365081550130211429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2196408733789348967.post-17014300670504218142009-12-05T05:13:53.805-08:002009-12-05T05:13:53.805-08:00Hi Von Rad,I usually find the word "contextua...Hi Von Rad,<br><br>I usually find the word "contextualisation" used for theology but I guess it may be used for preaching. Is preaching for nods "contextualised preaching" ? That's a good comment. <br><br>It actually depends on the context of the preaching.If the message is the Gospel made into a message that the listeners can understanding without diluting or misinterpreting the message, then it is "contextualised preaching."<br><br>But if the sermon is to entertain and to please the audience without any reference to the true Gospel, then it is "preaching for nods."<br><br>Just wondering too..Alex Tanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04003300678212296112noreply@blogger.com