Wednesday, December 5, 2007

The Great Catholic and Orthodox Divorce


The Great Divorce
For centuries Christians East and West lived as strangers to one another. Then Catholics violated the Orthodox.
Mark Galli (April 1, 1997)

One summer afternoon in the year 1054, as a service was about to begin in the great Church of the Holy Wisdom in Constantinople, Cardinal Humbert and two other legates of the Roman pope entered. They made their way to the sanctuary. They placed a sealed papal document—called a "bull"—on the altar and marched out. The bull proclaimed the patriarch of Constantinople and his associates excommunicated, no longer in communion with the church, no longer allowed to receive the grace of God through the sacraments.

When the cardinal passed through the western door, he shook the dust from his feet and said, "Let God look and judge." A deacon, guessing the contents of the bull, ran after Humbert in great distress and begged him to take it back. Humbert refused, and the deacon dropped the document in the street.

This incident is usually portrayed as the key moment in the Great Schism between the Orthodox East and the Latin West. But this incident is but one of many on the path to permanent schism—though surely the bloody events of 1204 put a seal on a break that lasts to this day.

The schism's causes are manifold and complex, and they reveal much of the uniqueness of what we now call the Eastern Orthodox Church—and how the Orthodox understand this chapter of Christian History…

From the sixth century on, a number of disputes erupted between Rome and Constantinople. One conflict in the middle of the ninth century revealed just how estranged East and West had become. The incident is usually known as the "Photian schism"—though the East would prefer to call it "the schism of Pope Nicholas."

It began in 858, when Patriarch Ignatius of Constantinople was exiled by the Byzantine emperor (for criticizing the emperor's private life). Ignatius resigned his office under pressure, and a gifted layman named Photius was appointed patriarch of the capital city. Photius has been called "the most distinguished thinker, the most outstanding politician, and the most skillful diplomat ever to hold office as patriarch of Constantinople."

Photius, as was the custom, sent a letter to the bishop of Rome, Pope Nicholas I, announcing his accession. Normally the pope would immediately recognize a new patriarch. But Nicholas balked. He had heard that the former patriarch still had supporters who claimed Photius was a usurper. Pope Nicholas decided to look into the matter. In 861 he sent legates to Constantinople.
Photius wanted no dispute with the papacy, so he treated the legates with great deference; he even invited them to preside at a local council to settle the issue. The council decided Photius was the legitimate patriarch.

When the legates returned to Rome, though, Nicholas accused them of exceeding their powers. He retried the case himself at Rome. This council repudiated Photius's claims, deposed him of all priestly dignity, and recognized Ignatius as patriarch.

The Byzantines ignored this Roman council and refused to answer the pope's letters.

The dispute centered on the papal claims, which had become another growing issue between East and West. Among Eastern churches, there was a strong sense of equality among bishops because a number of city churches claimed to have been founded by an apostle. The East acknowledged the pope as the first bishop of the church but saw him as only the first among equals.

In the West, only one great city church claimed apostolic foundation—Rome—so that Rome came to be regarded as the apostolic see. The Western church was seen less as a college of equals and more as a monarchy with the pope at its head. But the Byzantines didn't care if the Western Church was centralized, as long as the papacy did not interfere in the East...

Read complete article here

Reading Christian history helps us understand what is happening in the world today and why we do the things we do.
.

The Great Catholic and Orthodox Divorce


The Great Divorce
For centuries Christians East and West lived as strangers to one another. Then Catholics violated the Orthodox.
Mark Galli (April 1, 1997)

One summer afternoon in the year 1054, as a service was about to begin in the great Church of the Holy Wisdom in Constantinople, Cardinal Humbert and two other legates of the Roman pope entered. They made their way to the sanctuary. They placed a sealed papal document—called a "bull"—on the altar and marched out. The bull proclaimed the patriarch of Constantinople and his associates excommunicated, no longer in communion with the church, no longer allowed to receive the grace of God through the sacraments.

When the cardinal passed through the western door, he shook the dust from his feet and said, "Let God look and judge." A deacon, guessing the contents of the bull, ran after Humbert in great distress and begged him to take it back. Humbert refused, and the deacon dropped the document in the street.

This incident is usually portrayed as the key moment in the Great Schism between the Orthodox East and the Latin West. But this incident is but one of many on the path to permanent schism—though surely the bloody events of 1204 put a seal on a break that lasts to this day.

The schism's causes are manifold and complex, and they reveal much of the uniqueness of what we now call the Eastern Orthodox Church—and how the Orthodox understand this chapter of Christian History…

From the sixth century on, a number of disputes erupted between Rome and Constantinople. One conflict in the middle of the ninth century revealed just how estranged East and West had become. The incident is usually known as the "Photian schism"—though the East would prefer to call it "the schism of Pope Nicholas."

It began in 858, when Patriarch Ignatius of Constantinople was exiled by the Byzantine emperor (for criticizing the emperor's private life). Ignatius resigned his office under pressure, and a gifted layman named Photius was appointed patriarch of the capital city. Photius has been called "the most distinguished thinker, the most outstanding politician, and the most skillful diplomat ever to hold office as patriarch of Constantinople."

Photius, as was the custom, sent a letter to the bishop of Rome, Pope Nicholas I, announcing his accession. Normally the pope would immediately recognize a new patriarch. But Nicholas balked. He had heard that the former patriarch still had supporters who claimed Photius was a usurper. Pope Nicholas decided to look into the matter. In 861 he sent legates to Constantinople.
Photius wanted no dispute with the papacy, so he treated the legates with great deference; he even invited them to preside at a local council to settle the issue. The council decided Photius was the legitimate patriarch.

When the legates returned to Rome, though, Nicholas accused them of exceeding their powers. He retried the case himself at Rome. This council repudiated Photius's claims, deposed him of all priestly dignity, and recognized Ignatius as patriarch.

The Byzantines ignored this Roman council and refused to answer the pope's letters.

The dispute centered on the papal claims, which had become another growing issue between East and West. Among Eastern churches, there was a strong sense of equality among bishops because a number of city churches claimed to have been founded by an apostle. The East acknowledged the pope as the first bishop of the church but saw him as only the first among equals.

In the West, only one great city church claimed apostolic foundation—Rome—so that Rome came to be regarded as the apostolic see. The Western church was seen less as a college of equals and more as a monarchy with the pope at its head. But the Byzantines didn't care if the Western Church was centralized, as long as the papacy did not interfere in the East...

Read complete article here

Reading Christian history helps us understand what is happening in the world today and why we do the things we do.
.

Cord Blood: To Store or Not to Store?

In the last few years, a few companies have been set up to store cord blood of newborn for use in the future. Cord blood contains foetal red blood cells and other cells which can be harvested for stem cells. The argument is that if the child needs a bone marrow transplant in the future, there is already in cold storage, a ready source of his or her own cord blood.

On the surface, this seems like a good argument for planning and storing your newborn’s cord blood. After all, as parents, we want the best for our child.

Recently, there has been a move by the Ministry of Health in Malaysia to register and limit the licensing of cord blood storage companies to three. There is also talk of including these companies under the Private Hospital Act. There are a few reasons for this.

First, there is a matter of degeneration of the DNA and mitochondrial RNA of the cord blood cells over time. This degeneration is inevitable. Thus when the frozen cord blood is needed, which is usually in 20-30 years’ time, there will be some notable degeneration in the DNA and RNA. Nobody knows at present what the effect of this degeneration is because cord blood storage and retrieval has not been around that long.

Second, cord blood is stored frozen at a very specific low temperature. This temperature is maintained by liquid nitrogen as the cooling agent. Thus the companies storing cord blood must have very sophisticated instruments to monitor the temperature of the frozen cord blood and there must not be any large variation in temperature. All it takes is a single episode of temperature variation for the cord blood cells to be destroyed. In the case of a power failure, the few seconds for the back-up generator to come online make the difference (provided the backup generators work, of course).

Third, the cost of storing and maintaining cord blood can be prohibitive over time. The initial start up cost of collection, freezing and storage may cost about RM3,000 or more. Then there is the yearly cost of about RM1,000 per year. Multiply that with the number of years you want to keep it for your child and you will get an idea on how much it will cost you. Cord blood storage will be for the rich only. What about the poor?

Four, an argument is set forth for cord blood for marrow transplantation as an insurance policy in case your child develops leukaemia or thalassemia (these are the two common diseases quoted). Leukaemia and thalassemia have a genetic basis. Therefore, it does not make sense to transplant into your child the same genetic materials that caused the leukaemia and thalassemia in the first place.

Finally, there is the matter of the volume of cord blood stored. Most companies stores about 50-100 ml. By the time your child needs the cord blood for transplantation, he or she may be about 19-20 years old. The stored cord blood will not be enough for a single bone marrow transplantation.

On the other hand, I am not denying that there is a need for cord blood storage. Cord blood does provide a viable source for stem cells. I will strongly support the formation of a cord blood bank, preferably by the Ministry of Health, where cord blood from all newborns are stored. This functions like a regular blood bank, where all can draw from it as their needs requires, both rich and poor.



My other posting on stem cells are
Growing a New Heart
Hybrid-Test Drive.
and my personal view on Stem Cell research.

update (22.12.07):

Stem cell company threathen legal action against blogger by palmdoc
.

Cord Blood: To Store or Not to Store?

In the last few years, a few companies have been set up to store cord blood of newborn for use in the future. Cord blood contains foetal red blood cells and other cells which can be harvested for stem cells. The argument is that if the child needs a bone marrow transplant in the future, there is already in cold storage, a ready source of his or her own cord blood.

On the surface, this seems like a good argument for planning and storing your newborn’s cord blood. After all, as parents, we want the best for our child.

Recently, there has been a move by the Ministry of Health in Malaysia to register and limit the licensing of cord blood storage companies to three. There is also talk of including these companies under the Private Hospital Act. There are a few reasons for this.

First, there is a matter of degeneration of the DNA and mitochondrial RNA of the cord blood cells over time. This degeneration is inevitable. Thus when the frozen cord blood is needed, which is usually in 20-30 years’ time, there will be some notable degeneration in the DNA and RNA. Nobody knows at present what the effect of this degeneration is because cord blood storage and retrieval has not been around that long.

Second, cord blood is stored frozen at a very specific low temperature. This temperature is maintained by liquid nitrogen as the cooling agent. Thus the companies storing cord blood must have very sophisticated instruments to monitor the temperature of the frozen cord blood and there must not be any large variation in temperature. All it takes is a single episode of temperature variation for the cord blood cells to be destroyed. In the case of a power failure, the few seconds for the back-up generator to come online make the difference (provided the backup generators work, of course).

Third, the cost of storing and maintaining cord blood can be prohibitive over time. The initial start up cost of collection, freezing and storage may cost about RM3,000 or more. Then there is the yearly cost of about RM1,000 per year. Multiply that with the number of years you want to keep it for your child and you will get an idea on how much it will cost you. Cord blood storage will be for the rich only. What about the poor?

Four, an argument is set forth for cord blood for marrow transplantation as an insurance policy in case your child develops leukaemia or thalassemia (these are the two common diseases quoted). Leukaemia and thalassemia have a genetic basis. Therefore, it does not make sense to transplant into your child the same genetic materials that caused the leukaemia and thalassemia in the first place.

Finally, there is the matter of the volume of cord blood stored. Most companies stores about 50-100 ml. By the time your child needs the cord blood for transplantation, he or she may be about 19-20 years old. The stored cord blood will not be enough for a single bone marrow transplantation.

On the other hand, I am not denying that there is a need for cord blood storage. Cord blood does provide a viable source for stem cells. I will strongly support the formation of a cord blood bank, preferably by the Ministry of Health, where cord blood from all newborns are stored. This functions like a regular blood bank, where all can draw from it as their needs requires, both rich and poor.



My other posting on stem cells are
Growing a New Heart
Hybrid-Test Drive.
and my personal view on Stem Cell research.

update (22.12.07):

Stem cell company threathen legal action against blogger by palmdoc
.

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

A Journey of Discernment

Dr. Geoff Pound was the former Principal of Whitley College, the Baptist College of Victoria and is now residing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). He has written an online devotional book:

Making Life Decisions: Journey of Discernment
Forty Individual Reflections
with
Seven Group Studies
A Process of Discernment Guided by Down-to-Earth Biblical Principles

This free Online Book can be accessed here
He is also a prolific blogger and here are some of his other blogs
.

A Journey of Discernment

Dr. Geoff Pound was the former Principal of Whitley College, the Baptist College of Victoria and is now residing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). He has written an online devotional book:

Making Life Decisions: Journey of Discernment
Forty Individual Reflections
with
Seven Group Studies
A Process of Discernment Guided by Down-to-Earth Biblical Principles

This free Online Book can be accessed here
He is also a prolific blogger and here are some of his other blogs
.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Priority of Evangelism



source: Christianity Today, November 2007

Priority of Evangelism



source: Christianity Today, November 2007

Watching John Stott Lecturing on Romans

The Regent College in Vancouver invited John Stott to give a series of lectures on the book of Romans. These series of lectures were video taped and is now available in DVD (Region 1).

I bought a set online via Regent College bookstore. John Stott was awesome. In this 10 DVD he covered Romans, Chapter 1-8 looking at themes of the Gospel, grace, law, Spirit and wrath.

Disc 1& 2: God's Gospel and Paul's eagerness to preach.

Disc 3&4: God's Wrath and the Whole World's Guilt

Disc 5& 6: God's Grace and a Sinner's Justification

Disc 7 &8: God's Law and Our Release from its Bondage

Disc 9 &10: God's Spirit and Implication of Our Adoption.

This is John Stott at his best.

.

Watching John Stott Lecturing on Romans

The Regent College in Vancouver invited John Stott to give a series of lectures on the book of Romans. These series of lectures were video taped and is now available in DVD (Region 1).

I bought a set online via Regent College bookstore. John Stott was awesome. In this 10 DVD he covered Romans, Chapter 1-8 looking at themes of the Gospel, grace, law, Spirit and wrath.

Disc 1& 2: God's Gospel and Paul's eagerness to preach.

Disc 3&4: God's Wrath and the Whole World's Guilt

Disc 5& 6: God's Grace and a Sinner's Justification

Disc 7 &8: God's Law and Our Release from its Bondage

Disc 9 &10: God's Spirit and Implication of Our Adoption.

This is John Stott at his best.

.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Grad.Diploma in Christian Studies, Johor Bahru

The Malaysian Bible Seminary (MBS) English Programme leading to a Grad
Diploma in Christian Studies 2008 in Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

The tentative dates, subjects and
lecturers arranged for 2008 are as follows :

Jan 4-6, 2008 - Old Testament Introduction by Rev Dr Eddy Ho
(continuation from 2007 - those who missed the 1st sessions are also allowed
to follow as we will arrange for make up of the hours you could not attend)

Mar 21-23, 2008, Mar 28-30, 2008-New Testament Introduction by Mr Peter Rowan

Jun 20-22, 2008, Jun 27-29, 2008 - Hermeneutics by Rev Dr Eddy Ho

Sep 19-21, 2008, Sep 26-28, 2008 - Church History by Rev Loh Soon Choy

Nov 21-23, 2008, Nov 28-30, 2008 -Practical Theology by Pr Hilmy

The classroom hours are as follows :
Fridays 7:30pm to 10.30pm
Saturdays 9:00am to 6pm
Sundays 2:00pm to 7pm

Fees for each subject : RM80 x 3 = RM240 (A one time registration fee of
RM50 is to accompany with your registration). Students are expected to pay
for text books and photostated course materials, if any. There's also a
suggested RM25 per students per subject payable to cover for administrative
costs, etc.

Should you require the Registration Form and further information, please email Pastor Tan Chee Seng (coordinator) at tcs2002@streamyx.com

.

Grad.Diploma in Christian Studies, Johor Bahru

The Malaysian Bible Seminary (MBS) English Programme leading to a Grad
Diploma in Christian Studies 2008 in Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

The tentative dates, subjects and
lecturers arranged for 2008 are as follows :

Jan 4-6, 2008 - Old Testament Introduction by Rev Dr Eddy Ho
(continuation from 2007 - those who missed the 1st sessions are also allowed
to follow as we will arrange for make up of the hours you could not attend)

Mar 21-23, 2008, Mar 28-30, 2008-New Testament Introduction by Mr Peter Rowan

Jun 20-22, 2008, Jun 27-29, 2008 - Hermeneutics by Rev Dr Eddy Ho

Sep 19-21, 2008, Sep 26-28, 2008 - Church History by Rev Loh Soon Choy

Nov 21-23, 2008, Nov 28-30, 2008 -Practical Theology by Pr Hilmy

The classroom hours are as follows :
Fridays 7:30pm to 10.30pm
Saturdays 9:00am to 6pm
Sundays 2:00pm to 7pm

Fees for each subject : RM80 x 3 = RM240 (A one time registration fee of
RM50 is to accompany with your registration). Students are expected to pay
for text books and photostated course materials, if any. There's also a
suggested RM25 per students per subject payable to cover for administrative
costs, etc.

Should you require the Registration Form and further information, please email Pastor Tan Chee Seng (coordinator) at tcs2002@streamyx.com

.

Saturday, December 1, 2007

The SPIRIT in SPIRITual Gifts


The SPIRIT in SPIRITual Gifts
Text: 1 Cor.12:1-11


Sermon statement (big idea)

The Holy Spirit is builder of the church. He is the giver of spiritual gifts and he gives them to whom he chooses. The spiritual gifts are for the building up of the church and not for personal gain. Most teaching on spiritual gifts place more emphasis on the spiritual gifts rather than the giver. We must not miss the SPIRIT in SPIRITual gifts.

read complete sermon here

The SPIRIT in SPIRITual Gifts


The SPIRIT in SPIRITual Gifts
Text: 1 Cor.12:1-11


Sermon statement (big idea)

The Holy Spirit is builder of the church. He is the giver of spiritual gifts and he gives them to whom he chooses. The spiritual gifts are for the building up of the church and not for personal gain. Most teaching on spiritual gifts place more emphasis on the spiritual gifts rather than the giver. We must not miss the SPIRIT in SPIRITual gifts.

read complete sermon here

Friday, November 30, 2007

STM Study Tour to Greece


Announcing A Special Tour:
Following the Footsteps of Paul


Join Allen McClymont and Lim Kar Yong in a 10-day guided tour of Greece in end of May
2008, either as part of a 3-credit hour elective course for STM programme or as a tour
member.


Take an unforgettable trip by
following part of Paul’s Second
Missionary Journey (Acts 16:1-
18:22). Come and see, feel, and
take a walk with Paul in the cities
he visited. Investigate the
connection between the
archeological evidence and socialpolitical
settings of the ancient
cities evangelised by Paul and his
fascinating correspondence with
the churches he founded.


Places we will visit include Kavala (biblical Neapolis – Acts 16:11), Philippi (Acts 16:12-40),
Thessaloniki (biblical Thessalonica – Acts 17:1-9), Veria (biblical Berea – Acts 17:10-15),
Vergina, Kalambaka, Meteora monasteries, Delphi, Athens (Acts 17:16-34), Corinth (Acts
18:1-17), Cenchrea and Mycenae.


Special lectures will be organised for those who are taking this tour as an elective course.
We are now taking registration for those who are interested in the tour so that we could keep
you informed once details are finalised. Please indicate if you are interested as part of your
STM programme or as a tour member.



For further information contact
Dr Lim Kar Yong
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia
Lot 3011 Taman South East
Jalan Tampin Lama Batu 3
70100 Seremban
Tel: 06-6322815 Fax: 06-6329766
Email: karyong@stm.edu.my
Website: www.stm.edu.my